Comments on: All Purpose Online Quiz Result

By: ten billion butterfly sneezes » Uses for Facebook

ten billion butterfly sneezes » Uses for Facebook — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:13:35 +0000

[...] only other way I use FB is to play the most egregious time sink game I’ve ever encountered. A TWAC’s holy grail. I speak, even more sheepishly, [...]

By: ten billion butterfly sneezes » Today’s TWACness

ten billion butterfly sneezes » Today’s TWACness — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 20:50:05 +0000

[...] waiting to take this one, which remains to this day the funniest thing I’ve ever encountered on the [...]

By: Quandary Time at ten billion butterfly sneezes

Quandary Time at ten billion butterfly sneezes — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 17:49:12 +0000

[...] 1 – TWAC = Time Wasting Ass Clown. Thanks, Dave, for that timeless verbiage. [...]

By: Uplifter Weblog » IM Cartoons

Uplifter Weblog » IM Cartoons — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:02:50 +0000

[...] Sometimes, being a TWAC becomes an Uplifter. [...]

By: The Chair and Automan » Blog Archive » Setting The Bar Too High

The Chair and Automan » Blog Archive » Setting The Bar Too High — Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:45:00 +0000

[...] If you are a TWAC, like myself, you play a bunch of silly computer games. I play Freecell, Solitaire, Minesweeper and Spider Solitaire way more than what could be considered healthy. When I say I’ve played thousands of games of Freecell, I’m not only not overstating the case, I’m probably understating it. I’ve probably played an order of magnitude greater than that. [...]

By: The Chair and Automan » Blog Archive » Getting It Done

The Chair and Automan » Blog Archive » Getting It Done — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:35:20 +0000

[...] I am, in my heart of hearts, a TWAC. [...]

By: PJ Cabrera

PJ Cabrera — Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:59:09 +0000

I know I know, but dude, what’s my score?

You get an 88%, but since I read this blog AND the comments, do I get a 95%?

By: Ken Nelson

Ken Nelson — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:14:55 +0000

I’ve gotta admit, I searched the post for the URL when I read it originally, and thought “That’s not like Dave to miss something like that.” I reread it, and a smile crossed my face, followed by a great round of chortling.

But, then when I read James’s comment, I read the post yet again, looking for the URL. More chortling, after I understood that I’d been had again.

Ahh, the ease with which us old folks can be entertained.

–Ken–
Senior TWAC

By: dave

dave — Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:25:37 +0000

Ken, James did play along quite well, didn’t he? TWAC isn’t a bad acronym at that.

PJ, if you read this blog you are already wasting too much time as it is.

James, if you can make that joke it means that you’ve already taken too many.

By: Ken Nelson

Ken Nelson — Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:40:45 +0000

Taking advantage of the 2-for-1 comment option, I thought that TWAC will make an excellent acronym to include in a work-related email, when I’m feeling particularly snarky, and when I want to know if the recipient actually *read* it. Tomorrow will be an excellent day to do that.

And, on a related subject, a quick Google search for “Time Wasting Ass Clown” reveals that yes, the venerable EGC stands alone.

Very funny coment, James.
–Ken–

By: James

James — Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:04:50 +0000

When I took it I got the result of Time Conserving Ass Clown With Peckerheaded Tendencies. I got that one probably because I answered “yes” to “Would you eat a live puppy if you were hungry enough and it had short hair?” (number 11).

By: PJ Cabrera

PJ Cabrera — Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:26:04 +0000

What’s the URL? I want to know what my score is!

By: Ken Nelson

Ken Nelson — Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:01:32 +0000

I’ve taken a gazillion of these on-line “What type of X are you?”, and can’t remember one blasted result from any of ‘em. Thanks for summing me up so perfectly.
–Ken–